When is surveillance footage admissible in court?

Surveillance footage is deemed admissible in court primarily when it meets specific legal standards. It must be recorded legally, which means it should comply with laws regarding privacy and consent in the location where it was captured. Additionally, the footage must be relevant to the incident being investigated or litigated. If the video provides crucial evidence that can help establish facts pertinent to the case, it holds significant value in a legal setting.

While having footage reviewed by a lawyer might enhance its presentation in court, it is not a strict requirement for admissibility. The documentation of an event can support the context of the footage, but it is not a prerequisite for the footage to be considered admissible. Similarly, the duration for which footage is stored does not inherently affect its admissibility; what matters is the legality of the recording and its relevance to the case at hand. Therefore, admissibility hinges on these key factors surrounding legality and relevance.